Dillingham’s outrage stems from what he and many others see as blatant disrespect for a program that, while far from elite, has shown grit, resilience, and flashes of potential during a challenging season. The Sun Devils’ struggles in 2024 were not unexpected, given the injuries and tough schedule they faced, yet labeling them as the worst team in CFP history feels like a low blow. Critics argue that such a ranking is not only unnecessary but also counterproductive for the sport’s growth.
Arizona State’s Rocky Road
It’s no secret that ASU’s season has been turbulent. The Sun Devils have faced powerhouse programs, weathered key injuries, and undergone significant rebuilding under Dillingham’s leadership. Their record might not reflect a dominant team, but calling them the worst disregards the effort and context behind their performance.
CFP rankings are notorious for favoring big-name programs with deep histories, often ignoring the struggles of teams in transition. ASU’s placement raises the question: is this about football, or is it about protecting the legacy of certain programs while ridiculing others?
Dillingham’s Fight for Respect
Dillingham has repeatedly emphasized his mission to rebuild ASU’s football program from the ground up. His team’s progress is undeniable: players are improving, the fan base is growing, and ASU football is showing signs of life. Yet the CFP committee’s harsh ranking undermines these efforts, creating a narrative that paints the Sun Devils as irredeemable losers.
“We’re not Alabama or Georgia. We don’t have a bottomless pit of five-star recruits,” Dillingham pointed out. “But we fight. We work hard. And we’ve earned more respect than this nonsense ranking.”
The CFP’s Flawed System
This controversy highlights broader issues with the CFP’s evaluation process. The committee has often been accused of bias toward established programs and ignoring the achievements of smaller or rebuilding teams. Rankings like this perpetuate a cycle where powerhouse teams dominate the spotlight, while others are left to scramble for scraps.
By labeling ASU as the “worst,” the CFP sends a damaging message to players and fans: your effort doesn’t matter unless you’re already at the top. It’s a sentiment that discourages competition and innovation in the sport.
The Real Question: What’s the Point?
Why does the CFP even need to designate a “worst” team? College football is about passion, tradition, and the love of the game. Rankings like these are a petty attempt to sensationalize the sport, adding unnecessary drama while tearing down programs that are trying to grow.
Looking Ahead
Despite the noise, Kenny Dillingham remains focused on the future. His passion for ASU football and his players’ dedication are undeniable. Whether or not the CFP respects their efforts, the Sun Devils are determined to rise above the negativity.
Dillingham’s message to the CFP committee is clear: “Stop with the nonsense and start respecting the grind. Every team deserves better than this.”
In the end, college football fans will decide what matters more: flashy rankings or the heart and soul of the game. For now, ASU is playing for something greater than rankings—they’re playing for pride, progress, and the future.